Chemistry
What heat does to each cannabinoid
There is a sentence that makes the rest of this site make sense, and almost nobody says it: terpenes leave, cannabinoids change.
Terpenes are light. They evaporate, and a hot oven takes most of them with it. Cannabinoids are far heavier and do not boil off at any temperature a kitchen reaches — so nothing you do drives them out of the pan. What heat does to them instead is rearrange them, and one of those rearrangements is the whole reason edibles work while raw flower does not.
Heat does two different things
The one you want
Decarboxylation. Raw flower carries acids — THCA, CBDA, CBGA — and an acid does essentially nothing eaten. Heat drives one molecule of carbon dioxide off each of them, and what is left is the neutral form. That is the step, and skipping it is the most common reason a batch does nothing at all.
The schedule is on the decarb calculator; the arithmetic is on how this is calculated.
The one you do not
Degradation. Keep going past the point where conversion finishes and THC starts becoming CBN. That is not evaporation and it is not reversible — the milligrams do not come back when the pan cools.
It is why the hottest step on the decarb schedule, 280 °F, is listed with a warning rather than as the fast option — and why “leave it in a bit longer to be safe” is the most expensive wrong idea in this subject.
Both happen at once past a certain point. Decarbing well is picking a temperature where the first reaction is most of the way done before the second gets going — which is what the schedule is, rather than a rule somebody made up.
The seven you will meet
The acid forms are not listed separately, because THCA is not a different compound to choose between — it is what THC is before you heat it. Treating them as two things is how people end up believing raw flower is inert rather than simply uncooked.
THC Tetrahydrocannabinol
In the calculatorsTHCA C22H30O4 → THC C21H30O2 + CO₂1 g of THCA leaves 877 mg of THC
Made by the plant from CBGA, and present in raw flower almost entirely as the acid.
The one every number on this site is about. Raw flower carries THCA, which does nothing until heat drives off a molecule of carbon dioxide and leaves THC behind. Keep heating past that point and you start losing it again — not to evaporation, but to CBN, which is why every temperature ceiling in the decarb table sits where it does.
Degrades to CBN slowly, through heat, oxygen and time — and never back again.
CBD Cannabidiol
In the calculatorsCBDA C22H30O4 → CBD C21H30O2 + CO₂1 g of CBDA leaves 877 mg of CBD
Also made from CBGA, by a different enzyme. A plant leans one way or the other; it does not make both freely.
Behaves almost exactly as THC does through the oven, which is convenient: the same decarb schedule converts both, and the mass it loses on the way is identical because CBDA and THCA are built from the same atoms in a different arrangement. What it does not do is turn into CBN. That degradation path belongs to THC alone, and the two get conflated constantly.
CBG Cannabigerol
Not modeled hereCBGA C22H32O4 → CBG C21H32O2 + CO₂1 g of CBGA leaves 878 mg of CBG — -1 mg less than this site’s calculators assume
The one the others are made from. CBGA is the plant's starting material, and enzymes convert most of it into THCA or CBDA as the flower matures — so a mature plant has little left, and the lines that keep it are the ones bred not to convert it.
Decarbs like the rest, at very nearly the same ratio. The reason you rarely have much of it is agricultural rather than culinary: the plant spent it becoming something else before harvest.
CBC Cannabichromene
Not modeled hereCBCA C22H30O4 → CBC C21H30O2 + CO₂1 g of CBCA leaves 877 mg of CBC
A third branch off CBGA, usually a minor one.
Same atoms as THC and CBD in another arrangement, so it loses the same fraction of its mass decarbing. Present in small amounts in most flower and rarely reported on a label at all, which means you are usually cooking with some and have no figure for it.
CBN Cannabinol
Not modeled hereCBNA C22H26O4 → CBN C21H26O2 + CO₂1 g of CBNA leaves 876 mg of CBN — 1 mg less than this site’s calculators assume
Not really made by the plant. CBN is what THC becomes after enough heat, air and time — so its presence is a record of what happened to the material rather than of how it grew.
This is the one to read as a signal. A lab sheet with meaningful CBN on it is telling you the flower is old, was stored badly, or was cooked too hard — and every milligram of it was THC once. That conversion is one-way. It is also why old butter tests weaker than the day it was made, and why 'longer is safer' is the most expensive wrong idea in this subject.
THCV Tetrahydrocannabivarin
Not modeled hereTHCVA C20H26O4 → THCV C19H26O2 + CO₂1 g of THCVA leaves 867 mg of THCV — 10 mg less than this site’s calculators assume
Built on a shorter side chain than THC — three carbons instead of five — from a different precursor acid. Concentrated in some African and Asian landrace lines and scarce almost everywhere else.
Decarbs like the others, but the arithmetic is not quite the same. Because the molecule is smaller, the carbon dioxide it sheds is a larger share of its mass, so less of the acid survives as the neutral form than the figure this site's calculators use.
CBDV Cannabidivarin
Not modeled hereCBDVA C20H26O4 → CBDV C19H26O2 + CO₂1 g of CBDVA leaves 867 mg of CBDV — 10 mg less than this site’s calculators assume
CBD's short-chain counterpart, and as uncommon as THCV.
Shares THCV's arithmetic exactly, for the same reason: same atoms, different arrangement. If a label gives you a varin figure, the conversion to expect off the acid is a little lower than the one the calculators here assume.
Where our own number is a little off
Every calculator here converts acid to neutral at 0.877. That is exactly right for THC and CBD, which is what those calculators are for. It is about a percentage point high for the varins — THCV and CBDV have a shorter side chain, so the carbon dioxide they shed is a larger share of a smaller molecule, and 867 mg survives per gram of acid rather than 877 mg.
That gap is far inside the band any of these figures travel in, and it would be easy to leave unmentioned. It is here because a site whose entire argument is that it shows its work does not get to round its own error out of view.
What this page is not
There is no column here for what any of these does to a person, and that is deliberate. The charts that circulate — one cannabinoid per column, one condition per row, a dot in each cell — carry no sources, and they draw a compound with an approved medicine behind it exactly like one with a single laboratory result. This site says on every page that touches the subject that it does not suggest cannabis as a treatment for anything, and a table of cannabinoids is the easiest place in the world for that to stop being true.
What is here is chemistry you can act on in a kitchen: what converts, what degrades, and what it costs you when the oven runs hot.